The 105 Amendment of Indian Constitution was passed in 2021 and is an important step in addressing the representation of backward classes (specifically, the Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs)) in educational institutions, particularly in relation to the Maratha community in Maharashtra. The Amendment altered Article 15 and Article 16 of the Constitution, and its aim was to ensure fair representation and promote social justice in India.
To understand the significance and impact of the 105th Constitutional Amendment, we need to first delve into the background of the reservation system, the challenges faced in securing adequate representation for backward classes, and the subsequent legal and political developments that led to the amendment.
Table of Contents
1. Historical Context and Background
The Indian Constitution, which was adopted in 1950, incorporates provisions for affirmative action and reservation policies to uplift historically marginalized communities, especially those from the Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs). The reservation system in India aims to ensure these communities are represented in education, employment, and political spheres.
Over the years, various constitutional amendments have modified these provisions to expand the scope of reservation, accommodate the evolving needs of the population, and address legal challenges regarding the implementation of reservations.
However, in the case of Maratha reservations, the legal developments became more contentious. In 2020, the Maharashtra Government introduced the Maratha Reservation which was challenged in the courts. The 105th Amendment came into being to address the legal concerns regarding the Maratha community’s eligibility for reservations.
To understand the 105th Amendment, we need to examine its link to the Maharashtra State Reservation (for Marathas) case and how it directly addresses the Supreme Court‘s interpretation of Article 15 and Article 16 of the Constitution.
2. The Provisions of the 105 Amendment of Indian constitution
The 105 Amendment of Indian Constitution made key changes to Article 15 and Article 16. These changes allowed for the extension of reservations to a broader category of communities and individuals. Let’s break down the text of the amendment and how it altered the Constitution:
a) Amendment to Article 15(6):
Article 15(6) of the Constitution was introduced by the 105 Amendment of Indian constitution to allow economic backward classes (EWS) to be eligible for reservation in educational institutions. It reads:
“Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any special provision for the advancement of any economically weaker sections of citizens other than the classes referred to in clause (4) or clause (5)…”
This clause specifically refers to EWS reservation and applies to individuals who are economically disadvantaged but do not fall under the traditional categories of SC, ST, or OBCs.
b) Amendment to Article 16(6):
The 105th Amendment also led to an alteration in Article 16, which governs reservation in government employment. Article 16(6) allows for reservations for economically weaker sections:
“Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making provision for reservation in matters of employment in favour of any economically weaker sections of citizens other than the classes mentioned in clauses (4) and (5).”
This change was crucial in ensuring that the state could now provide for the advancement of economically weaker sections of society, even if they did not belong to the traditional reserved categories.
3. Key Legal and Political Challenges Leading to the 105 Amendment of Indian constitution
The 105th Amendment was necessitated by a series of political and legal challenges surrounding the Maratha community’s demand for reservation. In Maharashtra, the Maratha community, which constitutes a significant portion of the state’s population, was demanding reservation in education and employment.
a) The Legal Battles Over Maratha Reservation:
The state government of Maharashtra introduced a reservation policy for the Marathas in 2018. However, the Supreme Court of India, in 2020, struck down the law that granted the Maratha community 12-13% reservation in education and government jobs, stating that it violated the 50% reservation limit set by the Court in previous cases like Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992).
The Supreme Court ruling came as a setback for the Maharashtra Government, which had pushed for the Maratha reservation. The Maratha community was agitating for the inclusion of their community under the OBC category, to ensure their access to reservation benefits.
b) Constitutional Amendment and its Impact:
In response to the legal challenges, the 105th Amendment was enacted. This amendment allowed for the extension of economic reservations to communities like the Marathas, acknowledging that economic backwardness was a valid basis for securing benefits in education and employment. The amendment was a political and legal step to ensure that state governments could continue making provisions for communities that were not traditionally included in the reserved categories.
P.C. – cheggindia.com
4. The Significance of the 105th Amendment
The 105th Amendment is significant in several ways:
a) Providing for Economic Reservations:
By introducing Article 15(6) and Article 16(6), the amendment allowed the government to provide reservation for economically weaker sections (EWS), irrespective of caste or social standing. This provision sought to address economic inequalities and ensure that people from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, such as those in the Maratha community, could access opportunities.
b) Addressing Legal Precedents:
The 105th Amendment was an attempt to circumvent the legal limits imposed by previous Supreme Court judgments, such as the Indra Sawhney case, which capped reservations at 50%. By providing reservations to economically backward classes, the amendment addressed this legal challenge while ensuring that the 50% cap was not violated.
c) Expanding Social Justice:
The inclusion of economic criteria for reservations, alongside social and educational categories like SC, ST, and OBC, expanded the scope of affirmative action. It ensured that disadvantaged communities, even if not part of the scheduled categories, would not be left behind in a rapidly evolving society.
d) Addressing Maratha and Other Communities:
One of the key motivations behind the 105th Amendment was to ensure that communities like the Marathas, who were not traditionally part of the SC, ST, or OBC groups, could still receive reservations. This was done by recognizing economic backwardness as a legitimate criterion for granting affirmative action benefits.
5. Criticism and Controversies Surrounding the 105th Amendment
While the 105th Amendment was hailed by many as a step toward promoting social justice and inclusion, it has also faced significant criticism:
a) Dilution of Caste-Based Reservations:
Critics argue that by introducing economic criteria for reservations, the amendment dilutes the principle of caste-based affirmative action, which was designed to address the historic injustices faced by Dalits, tribals, and backward classes. By focusing on economic status, the amendment might undermine the social and historical basis for reservations.
b) Legal Challenges:
The 105th Amendment may still face legal challenges, particularly regarding the constitutional validity of providing reservation based on economic status. The Supreme Court may be called upon again to determine whether the amendment violates the basic structure of the Constitution, which has been interpreted in several landmark judgments.
c) Politicization of Reservations:
Another criticism is that the amendment is politically motivated, aimed at appeasing communities like the Marathas and securing votes in elections. By extending reservations to economically backward sections of society, the amendment is seen by some as a tool for vote bank politics.
6. Legal Implications of the 105 Amendment of Indian constitution
The 105 amendment of Indian constitution had far-reaching legal consequences in Indian constitutional law. It has reshaped the understanding of reservation policies, and the courts will need to interpret its provisions in light of India’s changing socio-political landscape.
a) The Future of Economic Reservations:
The economic reservation provisions introduced by the 105th Amendment are likely to be a key point of legal debate in the future. Courts may need to clarify whether economic backwardness can be a standalone criterion for granting affirmative action benefits.
b) Reservation Limitations:
The amendment has reignited the debate over the 50% cap on reservations, which the Supreme Court had previously imposed. The question remains whether the constitutional provisions introduced by the 105th Amendment violate the basic structure doctrine by potentially exceeding the 50% limit.
7. Latest Updates on the 105th Amendment
The 105th Amendment remains a subject of ongoing legal and political discussion. Its impact is still being assessed in various parts of India, especially in the context of Maratha reservations in Maharashtra. As the law continues to evolve, it’s important to stay updated on:
- Court Rulings: The Supreme Court may soon clarify the constitutional validity of the amendment and its alignment with the basic structure doctrine.
- State-Level Implementation: Different states may adopt the economic reservation model introduced by the amendment, and its implications will unfold over time.
- Political Developments: The political landscape surrounding reservations is likely to continue evolving, especially as political parties leverage these provisions for electoral gains.
8. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the 105th Amendment
- What is the 105th Amendment of the Indian Constitution? The 105th Amendment modifies Articles 15 and 16 of the Indian Constitution to allow for economic reservations for the economically weaker sections (EWS) of society.
- Why was the 105th Amendment introduced? The amendment was introduced to address the demands for reservation by communities like the Marathas, who were not part of the SC, ST, or OBC categories, but faced economic disadvantages.
- What is the significance of Article 15(6) and Article 16(6)? These provisions allow the state to make special provisions for the advancement of economically weaker sections in educational institutions and government employment.
- Does the 105th Amendment violate the 50% cap on reservations? Critics argue that the amendment may challenge the 50% cap set by the Supreme Court in the Indra Sawhney case. However, this remains a subject of legal debate.
- Who benefits from the 105th Amendment? The amendment primarily benefits economically weaker sections of society who do not fall under the traditional SC, ST, or OBC categories, such as the Marathas in Maharashtra.
- What is the future of economic reservations in India? Economic reservations are likely to continue being a major point of debate, and their legal validity and implementation will evolve over time.
- Are caste-based reservations still relevant under the 105th Amendment? The amendment focuses on economic criteria for reservation, which may dilute the relevance of caste-based reservations for some communities.
- Can the 105th Amendment be challenged in the Supreme Court? Yes, the amendment’s constitutionality, especially with regard to its impact on the 50% reservation limit, may be challenged in future cases.
- Is the 105th Amendment part of a larger trend in Indian politics? Yes, the amendment is part of a broader effort to extend reservations to more communities and ensure political representation for backward classes.
- How does the 105th Amendment impact Maratha reservation in Maharashtra? The amendment ensures that the Maratha community can receive reservations based on their economic status rather than their caste background.
Conclusion
The 105th Amendment of the Indian Constitution represents a significant shift in India’s reservation policy, expanding the scope of affirmative action to include economically backward classes. Its introduction has been met with both praise and criticism, as it seeks to address the demands of communities like the Marathas while upholding the principles of social justice and equality.
As India continues to grapple with issues of social inequality, the 105th Amendment will play a critical role in shaping the future of affirmative action, particularly in the context of economic reservations. However, its legal and political implications are far from settled, and it will require careful scrutiny by lawmakers, the judiciary, and the public.
For a detailed exploration, refer to government sites such as https://www.india.gov.in and other reliable legal databases for updates and legal precedents regarding the 105th Amendment.
Also Read: Contingent Contract: A Comprehensive Understanding of Its Nature, Application, and Legal Perspectives
Also visit: Online Legal Service, Virtual Advice and Consultation
Also Read: An In-Depth Exploration of the Limitation Act, 1963